Access control - authorisation overview
Authorisation
Authorisation is the process by which you apply specific permissions to resources. Only users who pass the permission criteria for the resource have access.
The server of a Genesis application provides three main types of resource entry point for clients to instigate events or to query data.
- Data Servers
- Event Handlers
- Request Servers
All these services can be permissioned using a permissioning GPAL syntax block in the GPAL configuration associated with the service.
Permissioning block snippet
// this example would be enclosed within a resource (eg DataServer Query) specific block
permissioning {
// 'permission Code' list, users must have the permission to access the enclosing resource
permissionCodes = listOf("TRADER", "SUPPORT")
// Permission at the row and/or column level for a grid or table of data
auth("TRADE_VISIBILITY") {
TRADE_VIEW.TRADE_ID
}
// customPermissions allow you to write custom code to determine user access.
customPermissions { message ->
customFunction(message.userName)
}
}
Global and specific permissioning
Here's what you need to know:
- A permissioning block can exist inside a resource (
requestReply
,query
oreventHandler
) definition. In this case, it applies only to that resource definition. This is specific permissioning. - Alternatively, you can specify a permissioning block outside any resource in the file. This is global permissioning. If you do this, the permissioning applies by default to all the resources in the file. However, any permissioning block inside a specific resource overrides this default.
- The permissioning block at the global level can only contain
permissionCodes
, as theauth
block is based on each individual resource definition and thecustomPermissions
block provides access to the incoming message. - Every request that comes into a Genesis server will include the username of an authenticated user. Non-authenticated users will not have access to or visibility of the Genesis services.
In the example below, the block applies to a specific requestReply
within a Request Server:
requestReplies {
requestReply("MARKET_INSTRUMENTS", INSTRUMENT_DETAILS) {
permissioning {
permissionCodes = listOf("TRADER")
}
}
}
In the example below, the global permissioning applies by default to the first three requestReply
blocks in the Request Server. However, the fourth requestReply
block has a specific permissioning block requiring the user to be in the list SUPER.
requestReplies {
permissioning {
permissionCodes = listOf("TRADER")
}
requestReply("ALLOCATION CODES", ALLOCATION CODES)
requestReply("ALL_COUNTERPARTIES", ALL_COUNTERPARTIES)
requestReply("ALL_BROKERS", ALL_BROKERS)
requestReply("ALL_TRADES", INSTRUMENT_DETAILS) {
permissioning {
permissionCodes = listOf("SUPER")
}
}
}
Permissioning sub-blocks
There are three main sub-blocks to the permissioning block that can be applied to suit your needs:
PermissionCodes
listauth
sub-blockcustomPermissions
function
PermissionCodes list
Here is a simple example:
permissionCodes = listOf("TRADER", "SUPPORT")
Where a PermissionCodes
list is defined, the user must have one of the listed permission codes to access the GPAL enclosed resource.
If the user does not belong to one of the listed permission codes, the subsequent auth block will essentially be ignored.
To enable a user to have access to a specific permissionCode
:
- the
permissionCode
must be defined in theRIGHT
table - the code must be linked to an entry in the
PROFILE_RIGHT
table - the code must be linked to a
PROFILE
that is associated with the USER fromPROFILE_USER
The AUTH_MANAGER
process will populate the RIGHT_SUMMARY
table based on the table configurations above. This table ultimately drives the available permission codes for all users in the system.
These tables are part of the Genesis Auth module.
Auth sub-block
Here is an example:
auth(mapName = "ENTITY_VISIBILITY") {
POSITION.COUNTERPARTY_ID
}
Where an auth
sub-block is defined, you can provide further fine-grained control of what data, at the row level, is returned to a specific user. If it is not defined, then all data is returned for the enclosing resource, assuming permissionCodes
are not restricting access.
The reference POSITION.COUNTERPARTY_ID
in the auth snippet above refers to the COUNTERPARTY_ID field from the POSITION object that is supplied as a parameter to the resource request. This value is used as a key into a specific AuthCache, identified by entity name. In this example, that is "ENTITY_VISIBILITY"
Each AuthCache will map Entity Id (in our example, COUNTERPARTY_ID from the POSITION object) to a Set of users.
The mapName
parameter refers to a specific permission entity defined on the server via the auth-permission.xml file. For example:
<dynamicPermissions>
<!-- other tags removed for brevity -->
<entity name="ENTITY_VISIBILITY"
tableName="USER_COUNTERPARTY_MAP"
maxEntries="20000"
idField="USER_NAME">
<!-- further structure with groovy expression to define programmatic control and define an AuthMap -->
</entity>
<!-- additional entities would go here-->
</dynamicPermissions>
In cases where you do not require the auth map and just want to define a where
clause, you can omit it from the definition. For example:
auth {
where {
...
}
}
Custom permissions function
Here is a simple example for a dataserver block:
customPermissions { message ->
val userAttributes = entityDb.get(UserAttributes.byUserName(message.userName))
userAttributes?.accessType == AccessType.ALL
}
The customPermissions
function acts as an additional permissions check which works in a similar way to permissionCodes
. If this function returns true, the user will be able to access the resource, otherwise the request will be rejected. The example above performs a database lookup on the "USER_ATTRIBUTES" table, and will only return true if the user has AccessType.ALL
.
The main advantage of declaring a customPermissions
function is that you can write any sort of custom code within it. This can make integration with existing entitlement systems a much easier task, as it means you can avoid replicating the correct rights and profiles hierarchy within the Genesis database.
All customPermissions
functions give you access to a property called entityDb
that provides access to the database API. Additionally, customPermissions
provides a function parameter that contains the request message itself. This type of this message will vary depending on where the customPermissions
function has been declared:
- Data Server - the parameter will be of type
Details<DataLogon>
. This message contains all the options specified by the client when attempting to create a dataserver subscription, as well as the username. - Request Server - the parameter will be of type GenesisSet, as Request Server definitions can heavily customise the inbound metadata, and it might not necessarily match any pre-existing generated entity.
- Custom Request Server - the parameter will be of type
Request<V>
whereV
is the class used to define the inbound message. More information about custom Request Servers can be found here. - Event Handler - the parameter will be of type
Event<V>
whereV
is the class used to define the inbound message. This parameter is also present in theonValidate
andonCommit
GPAL Event Handler functions.
Generic permissions
Generic permissions is a term used to name the optional permissions configuration that is available for a Genesis application; this is included as part of the Genesis Auth Module.
To fully activate Generic permissions, you need to add the following values to your product system definition file locate under the config
project (for example alpha-system-definition.kts
) before you run genesisInstall
.
These values specify which table column will be used to associate users with entities for fine-grained row permissions.
systemDefinition {
global {
item(name = "ADMIN_PERMISSION_ENTITY_TABLE", value = "COUNTERPARTY")
item(name = "ADMIN_PERMISSION_ENTITY_FIELD", value = "COUNTERPARTY_ID")
}
}
Note these important details:
-
These values will add the specified field to the
USER_ATTRIBUTES
table as a required field and create a new table calledUSER_COUNTERPARTY_MAP
(in the case of our example), which will be suitably populated by the AUTH_MANAGER process on a real-time basis. -
The
USER_COUNTERPARTY_MAP
table is referenced in theENTITY_VISIBILITY
entity in the auth-permission.templt.xml file. This file is a Genesis mustache template that is processed whengenesisInstall
is run, using entries from system-definition. -
When new users are created in the Genesis user entity management, a required field, COUNTERPARTY, is presented to the operating user. This limits users to belonging to a single counterparty.
A user can define additional permissions.xml files. For example, you could define something like order-management-permissions.xml, with an order management system auth implementation, and it will be read by AUTH_PERMS
process on start-up.
There are two kinds of permission entity defined by Generic Permissions in the auth-permission.templt.xml file:
-
USER_VISIBILITY - an AuthCache that determines which user is visible to which user; this is driven by which users are associated for the entity. Using our example, if two users are both in the same counterparty, then they should be viewable to each other.
-
ENTITY_VISIBILITY - an AuthCache that determines if a user has access to a particular entity; in our example, if the user is permissioned for a particular counterparty, then that user will be able to see the associated row data for that counterparty.